by Jonathan Krall
This week’s flimflam Exhibit A is a poll in the Alexandria Times (scroll down to find the poll). They ask, “Do you think the Sheriff’s Office should cooperate with ICE?” and give us four answers to select from: Yes, Only if judicial warrants are provided, No, and I’m not sure. Because you, Alexandrian reader, are probably smarter than average, you have probably already noticed that the “no” vote will be split between “No” and “Only if judicial warrants are provided.” Thus, the bias of the Alexandria Times is once again revealed. The correct answer is “No.”
Requested action: Please visit https://alextimes.com/, scroll down to find the poll, select “No,” and submit your answer. (Thanks!)
Background: ICE is not a government agency deserving of our respect, support, or cooperation. No one should cooperate with ICE. When life or liberty are at stake, people might obey ICE, but obedience is not cooperation. Advocates are asking that Sheriff Casey only obey ICE when a judge, via a judicial warrant, forces him to do so.
And the flimflam doesn’t stop there! In the past few weeks, while advocates and city council talk about “ICE administrative warrants” and “judicial warrants,” Sheriff Casey invokes “lawful warrants” and “federal warrants.”
All this reminds us of a bit from comedian George Carlin: “Flammable, inflammable, and nonflammable… Why are there three? Don’t you think that two ought to serve the purpose? I mean either the thing flams or it doesn’t!”
Continue reading “Wading through the flimflam”
